Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Politics

White House Officials Challenge Leaked Details From Bolton Book

Top White House officials, including Attorney General William Barr, challenged details that were lea..

Top White House officials, including Attorney General William Barr, challenged details that were leaked from an upcoming book from former National Security Adviser John Bolton, who was ousted last year.

Bolton allegedly told Barr he was worried that President Donald Trump was granting favors to the leaders of China and Turkey, an anonymously sourced report in The New York Times claimed. Bolton reportedly claimed that Barr responded that he was also concerned.

The conversation didnt go as Bolton described, the Department of Justice said.

“There was no discussion of personal favors or undue influence on investigations, nor did Attorney General Barr state that the presidents conversations with foreign leaders was improper,” department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement late Monday.

“If this is truly what Mr. Bolton has written, then it seems he is attributing to Attorney General Barr his own current views—views with which Attorney General Barr does not agree.”

U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks
U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks
Attorney General William Barr speaks at a press conference at the Department of Justice in Washington on Jan. 13, 2020. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)

A lawyer for acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney also challenged claims that are apparently part of Boltons manuscript.

The book reportedly alleged that Mulvaney was present when Trump spoke with his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, about former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who was fired last year. No excerpts from the book were published by any of the outlets that reported on leaked details.

“John Bolton never informed Mick Mulvaney of any concerns surrounding Boltons purported August conversation with the president,” Mulvaneys lawyer, Bob Driscoll, said in a statement.

“Nor did Mr. Mulvaney ever have a conversation with the president or anyone else indicating that Ukrainian military aid was withheld in exchange for a Ukrainian investigation of Burisma, the Bidens, or the 2016 election.”

“Furthermore, Mr. Mulvaney has no recollection of any conversation with Mr. [Rudy] Giuliani resembling that reportedly described in Mr. Boltons manuscript, as it was Mr. Mulvaneys practice to excuse himself from conversations between the president and his personal counsel to preserve any attorney-client privilege,” the statement said.

Epoch Times Photo
Epoch Times Photo
President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media as National Security Adviser John Bolton listens in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Aug. 20, 2019. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The statements came after Trump took to Twitter to rebut a Bolton allegation, writing: “NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens.”

“In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book,” Trump added.

Bolton hasnt denied the leaked details from his book but did deny coordinating with media outlets. An Amazon page that enabled pre-orders of the book, which will be published in March, went live just hours after the first story about book details.

“Ambassador John Bolton, Simon & Schuster, and Javelin Literary categorically state that there was absolutely no coordination with The New York Times or anyone else regarding the appearance of information about his book, THE ROOM WHERE IT HAPPENED, at online booksellers. Any assertion to the contrary is unfounded speculation,” a spokesperson for Bolton said in a statement.

Vice President Mike Pences office, meanwhile, also rebutted allegations that were recently floated.

Pence wasnt aware of any link between pausing congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine and Trump asking Ukrainian PreRead More – Source
[contf]
[contfnew]

The Epoch Times

[contfnewc]
[contfnewc]